The Economist On Why Copyright Needs To Return To Its Roots
The life expectancy in the UK 300 years ago was approximately 35 years. [source: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/dg09102006.pdf ] This meant that a copyright period of 14 - 28 years was sufficient to cover the average person's lifespan (assuming people did not write books before the age of 7!). One could therefore argue that a longer period might be justifiable. Personally, I do not think that a reduced copyright period of 14 - 28 years would stifle commercial creativity in any way.
Posted on Tuesday, 20th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 17:08
How To Piss People Off: Publish A Book Using Their Tweets Without Asking Them First
The publishers are creating a bad moral precedent...we should not (and in fact do not) need permission to quote something stated in public!
Posted on Tuesday, 13th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 20:21
Eric Schmidt: Mobile Is The Future, And There’s No Such Thing As Communication Overload
Maybe the US is less relevant than it thinks! When everyone in the third world has a computer in their pocket the American masses will no longer be the masses. When every phone is a smartphone, the brand will not really matter either. (I had look under desk to determine the brand of the PC I am using to type this comment). If Nokia starts churning out cheap Android phones they will be fine.
Posted on Tuesday, 13th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 12:40
Economist Assumes That The Problem Is 'Thieves' Rather Than Bad Patent Laws
I suspect because they generate comments!
Posted on Monday, 12th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 17:57
Another Example of why Social E-Commerce is Awesome
For the goldfish it must be like living at the graveyard!
Posted on Monday, 12th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 17:42
Is 2011 like 1994 for Apple, Twitter, Facebook, and the Web?
Apple's days are numbered. One of these days every phone will be a smartphone, and they will NOT be Apples. They will probably be running Android (as will your TV, GPS, etc) and while it is possible that no single device will have the market share that Apple has, collectively they will out-number Apple by a large margin. Already in some markets (USA?) the number of Android phones is approaching the number of iPhones. As for "Apps", the only native App I want to have to use is the browser, everything else should be in the cloud, accessible from any dumb device with a screen.
Posted on Monday, 12th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 08:45
MLB Comes Out Swinging With MLB.TV, Yet The NFL Won’t Spend $3K on NFL.TV
The concept of “premium names” seems to be a bit of a scam. I am not surprised that companies are avoiding them.
Posted on Monday, 5th April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 10:21
Mobile Phones Suck... But Isn't It Amazing That They Exist?
My Sumsung has a "reject list" feature - the phone does not ring if someone on the list phones.
Posted on Saturday, 3rd April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 10:46
NYTimes Request Correction/Removal Of Our Post. We Decline.
...and Merry Christmas to you!
Posted on Friday, 2nd April 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 07:38
Memeo Is Bringing A Google Docs Reader To The iPad
Why does one need a special "app" to access a browser-based application (Google Docs)? Does this not defeat the object of using a cloud-based application?
Posted on Wednesday, 31st March 2010 by Michael Lockyear | 14:29




