A SITE that nobody knows exists isn't very powerful, is it?

Newspapers need a bit more than innovation. They are trying to sell metaphorical buggy whips in the age of the automobile! There problem is that they are trying to sell generic content, to people who only have geographic location in common...just not niche enough I am afraid.

Search on mobile is growing...the opportunities for advertising in this sector are also huge, especially when linked to location-based services. Locational-search advertising may well be the next "big thing" (remember in a few years, EVERY mobile phone will be a smart-phone) Voice and maps (and android and latitude) are obvious strategies to ensure that they are relevant in this space.

They may as well just scrap television...with copyright on the way out, there will not be any decent content on the box anyway (nobody is going to make $100m movies or even $1m tv if rivals can just rebroadcast it).

The next time a blogger writes that the US is a great place (to live / work / visit) because they have freedom of speech I am reporting them to the FTC!

He should resign...the world should boycott Belgium until he does.

…and here we have you complaining…say no more…

One should consider the quality of the results and not just the quantity ...on the twitter screen-shot shown, 2 of the results were junk and only 1 had a link (which one assumes was to a news site), whereas all the Google results shown were potentially useful. Which of the 2 is ready for prime-time is debatable.

Video on a cellphone...what a killer feature! The cellphones I have been using for the last 4 years have all offered this feature...

My understanding is that in the US even kids can be sex offenders (google “sexting”). ALL criminals (6.5% of the US population!) should be included…as I single guy I would not be particularly disturbed by a sex offender, but OTHER criminals might scare me!